Development notes

The important point to make with respect to
space-time mediated electromagnetism is the equivalence in the dynamics of the Compton effect resulting from a null interval strike from a remote quantum system and that calculated by regarding light as an independent particle. The compliance between QED and experimental verification is famous for its accuracy. It is therefore important that any new interpretation should not deviate dynamically significantly from QED. The new interpretion of The compton effect at a superficial level at least meets this requirement. Leaving us with the possibility of creating a self-consistent interpretation of electromagnetism without creating a system of dynamics which is going to deviate from the existing theory.

The new interpretation also allows for energy which may be containied within a spatially extensive quantum system to become entangled with other remote spatially extenxive systems. Allowing abrupted changes to the eigen values of interacting quantum systems. Helping us maybe able to understand how the quantum states of systems change?

Given the validity of Minkowski's space-time metric; energy can pass from a quantum system A at an event 1 to a quantum system B at an event 2, providing the proper time interval separating the two events has zero magnitude. The structure of space-time enables electromagnetic interaction between quantum systems without the need for a third party carrier medimum. (No particles. No waves are required). The accepted metric for space-time seems to exclude the possibility of free photons. This means the standard interpretation of quantum electrodymamics is probably wrong in spite of its extreme accuracy with experimental results. This need not be a problem provided we accept the principle of equivalence, that a strike from a remote quantum system via a null interval surface is the dynamic equivalent of being dynamically being struck by a free particle(a photon).

In the standard theory charged quantum objects are thought of as continually emitting virtual photons. As soon as it emits it, then the object is thought to reabsorb the virtual photon. With zero net effect on the average inertial state of the object.ADD more.

However, if the Minkowski metric is valid then it appears that the structure of space-time precludes the existence of of free photons virtual or otherwise. Instead of emitting photons the object must interact with remote objects.

The conclusion that electromagnetically charged entities are continuously interacting with spatiallly remote charged objects suggests the intriguing possibility that the quantum electrodynamc activity of entities may be influenced by the distribution of matter within the universe. The possibility of QED being modified to create a universal force of attraction between massive objects is particularly intriguing. It begs the question is gravity a manefestation of QED?

{(((((((( Development Requirements

Proton

Unit charge (1.602 × 10-19 coulomb)
Mass (1.6726 × 10-27 kg,

Electron

Properties

Mass: 9.109 3826(16) × 10-31 kg

Electric Charge: -1.602 176 53(14) × 10-19 C

It is believed that the number of electrons existing in the known universe is at least 10^79. This number amounts to a density of about one electron per cubic metre of space.

Classical diameter

1.18 10^15 meters

Barn = 7 10^15 m^2

Diameter of the universe

13.7 10^9 ly = 1.29612E+26 m

G = 6.67x10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2

e0 = 8.8542×10-12 Farad/meter (F/m) = 8.8542×10-12 Coulomb2/Newton-meter2(C2/N-m2) )))))))))}